Claims for Mental Processes for Resolving Disputes by Arbitration Were Unpatentable
Case: In re Comiskey, No. 2006-1286 (Fed. Cir. 9/20/07)
The One Sentence Summary: Claims for a method of submitting disputes to arbitration were unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 when they were no more than mental processes, but the addition of a computer and communication devices to such claims was remanded to the PTO for whether the addition of these devices was obvious.
The One Sentence Summary: Claims for a method of submitting disputes to arbitration were unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 when they were no more than mental processes, but the addition of a computer and communication devices to such claims was remanded to the PTO for whether the addition of these devices was obvious.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home